The past two weeks has brought a lot of focus on our country’s new leader and his ‘leadership style’. Regardless of what you think of what we are hearing or observing, there is no question that our overall collective desire is to see achievement of the goals that are important to us as a nation and individually. In organizations, the same desire holds true.
It makes little difference if one has a responsibility to lead an entire organization, a department, a full team or just one other person.
all situations. These are the basics:
- Achieving the goals of those we have established as desired and needed
- Operating in ways that will instill trust in us as a leader … a key ingredient to gaining the respect of our reports
- Creating an environment in which people are willing to follow our lead so that success will be realized at the highest possible level
To the extent we can agree that these basics are among the goals of most leaders, the style that one employs to achieve them varies greatly. The variance and how we choose to be a leader is influenced by several things that include our experience, the effectiveness of the models we have had and the personalities that we bring to the responsibility. Here are leader ‘types’ that I encounter with regularity:
- The Teacher/Mentor
Teaches, demonstrates and guides reports with the intent that they learn and grow in their capabilities thus making them individually stronger and more valuable to the effort
- The Ambassador
Democratic and one who strives to bring people together by providing all with a voice intent on building consensus. This approach often results in encouraging creative thinking by encouraging diversification of perspectives and approaches. - The Warrior/General
Driven by power, status, and certainty at the same time he/she comes off as entitled, arrogant, and authoritarian. Immediate compliance is required.. It is a style more associated with times past as consensus building is not the goal. Performance is. - The Servant
Viewed as being the ‘inspirational’ type. The approach puts team members first. In this humanistic style, the leader is seen as a listener and empathetic with reports demonstrating high morale and enthusiasm for the tasks at hand.
- The Coach
Out to build a cooperative and high-functioning team. Although the personal style of coaching may vary, the goal of developing individual skills, maximizing the cooperative success of the group is one that drives
this leader type.
Once any of us are put into a position of leadership it is often the style of leadership in a given culture that will clearly impact personal success as well as that of the organization, department, team or individual we lead. To me, this seems worthy of consideration and a conscious choice. Agree?
Mike Dorman
In many companies, the New Year signals the annual review time. Whether it’s dreaded or positively anticipated has to do with a couple of things. The reviewer in terms of how much effort they put into it and importance they place on it. To the reviewee the review is impacted in terms of how seriously they hear and accept it. However, in today’s employer’s job market, your forthcoming review is your opportunity to minimize the risk of your boss being
you to come across as the one to keep. You will be making the boss less interested in looking elsewhere at the same time you get what you want … your job and its’ potential! Seems like this is a winner from all sides AND it actually s inexpensive cement … just your time and attitude.
ustrated by their lack of the personal success they strive to have
e the person and the value that coaching can and does provide. Therein lies a myth about the process. It is not simply addressing things that we find challenging and limiting. In fact, its’ true power is derived when we focus on furthering the positives and amplifying them to help the forward movement of our goals and successes.
around from a downward slide or just existing on flat terrain. And there is also no doubt that it can be extremely effective when used as such. However, when people use the coached approach to capitalize on the successes already realized to redefine that climb to their higher level they are taking advantage of an exciting and valuable aid to speeding up the process.
Today there is a trend that is markedly different. As Millennials have overtaken the number of Baby Boomers in the workplace, there are more and more situations wherein it is a younger person that is being promoted into positions of management which means there are many older employees now reporting to a younger boss. From where I sit and
assumption rather than knowing it to be fact and that’s when problems arise … problems that often prove to be costly, cause frustration and ultimately, a general unrest within the team.
ssumptions.
Regardless of what you discover you will then know how you should and need to proceed. Perhaps nothing other than to work to tame your imagination. Or perhaps you will need to have more conversation to understand the other person’s point of view. Just remaining satisfied that your original assumption is right will eventually impact the relationship negatively resulting in withdrawal from the other person(s). That in turn can clearly impact both the organization’s success and one’s personal satisfaction and enjoyment of his/her jobs.