Whether it’s a ‘boss’ giving an evaluation to a report or a member of a team providing it to another team member, providing feedback is a great tool for influencing behaviors and encouraging the
learning that will result in an overall improved performance. It facilitates opportunities for general performance growth and development. At least, this is how feedback is supposed to work. As many are only too glad to report, what they experience is not motivating in a positive way and in fact, is often dreaded by both the giver and the recipient.
The following are suggestions that can turn feedback into a win for the recipient, the provider and, most importantly, the organization.
- Frequency:
Providing feedback should not be limited to annual review. Rather providing frequent input to someone working to be successful … for the company, the team/department or themselves. It’s the nature of the changes one might be looking to bring about that should dictate the frequency of these conversations. Often times it’s the person who is being reviewed that can best suggest a frequency that can will make sense to them.
- Focus … on the issue or process and not the person:
Expressing a desire to see something done differently for the good of the project or company is a way to engage the other person in driving a solution or change. Making it about what ‘you do’ or how ‘you always …’ has the effect of closing the ears of the recipient and reducing the conversation to one that is defensive, combative or just shut down.
- Enter the conversation … intent on it being a 2-way communication:

If you are delivering the review, do so knowing that there is perhaps another perspective held by the ‘reviewee’. Let that person know that you are presenting a situation about which you have a concern telling them that you definitely want to hear their perspective on the issue. You may learn something that will explain things so as to alter your initial impression.
- What’s going well and what could be better … make it all-encompassing meeting:
It’s just as important the reviewing performance emphasize the successful aspects of the job being done as well as those in need of improvement. Just as we might want to see some change, we also want to reinforce things that are contributing to a successful effort.
- The reviewee’s contribution … bringing their list of things they believe they are doing well and the things they believe they can learn to do better:
It’s a way to set the tone for the 2-way conversation you want and you have set the foundation for a spirited exchange leading to an effective move-ahead plan.
- Be willing to be vulnerable as the reviewer:

You may be the boss however that doesn’t mean that you have or need to have all the answers. You are also a learner which allows you to hear and be influenced in your opinion by the input the the one being reviewed will provide.
A big reason as to why performance reviews get a bad rap is because of the way in which they are handled. It’s understandable that salaries are often reviewed annually. However every person comes to work about 250 days in that same year and changing a performance review into something done with frequency and regularity removes the potential sting, dread and resistance from all sides. If this makes sense to you, you need not wait for someone else
to make this happen. Just make the request that you would like to meet … i.e. monthly or quarterly … so as to be able to chart your own progress and related value to your position and the company. If done the right way reviews will move from a thing of dread and resistance to one of valuable anticipation. Now make it happen and at least, try it.
Mike Dorman
playing field from all angles and at all speeds and our job is to send them down paths that will give us more points by keeping the ball in play as long as possible. Those who have spent hours and quarters playing these games in arcades know that they provide us with fun and challenge, however, we also know that ultimately we will lose with no real reward or great accomplishment. I think it’s a clever and meaningful analogy.
each day having prepared your ‘to-do’ list for tomorrow … items you intend to address and categorized as A, B or C based on their priority. This help one stay focused on those things they must do tomorrow leaving lesser priorities for doing when time allows.
luck using this form of reverse psychology?
that job. Now if that’s the goal, then the steps below are forthright and easy. If that’s not the goal we then know what we have to avoid.
resources to perform their jobs, you will likely end up with contented, engaged employees.
safe to say that this is not the intended goal within any organization or with any leader. And yet, taking the above 6 points into consideration can sure serve as a measure of what we might be doing that works against our intention of building a dedicated, enthusiastic and committed team. Consider this a litmus test and see what color appears where you are involved.
so long that you’ve lost your excitement for the work. Or … changes in management have not been well received and it’s more difficult to want to be a productive team contributor. And then there are situations where we are experiencing challenges in another area of our lives which just makes concentration at our job seem less important and we inadvertently put it on a back burner.
Change your perspective – doing certain tasks in new ways can achieve changing the way we see them and help to get us out of a rut. It’s an effective way to help us get out of our rut.
ur end goal – use props to help you keep focused on the end goal. A picture of the finished product, the building you’re selling or the stack of money you’ll earn in bonus can prove to be a simple and motivating way to stay focused on your aim.
confidence is directly related to our mojo … the thing that lets us absolutely know that we can succeed. Recognizing that it has waned or even been lost is our first job. Is it easy? Not really because we are charged with bringing about a behavioral change. It’s safe to say that for most, this takes determination to do so and the commitment to stay the course. At least in this case the hard work brings with it definite rewards!
But what does that require? I have heard this asked many times when working with someone charged with the responsibility of leading either a single person or an entire group. The question arises when this leader is frustrated by the response they aren’t getting from their reports of team members and that, in turn, becomes an obstacle to achieving their intended goals.
leader who isn’t knowledgeable enough to guide them to their desired future and outcome.
Trust is very important to leadership. Also, important to leadership. No one follows a leader they don’t trust. Trust breeds likability. Leaders can still meet resistance in the followers if they lack the ability to be trusted even though they have satisfactorily met the other standards.
